Discussion on terms

Zaku350 wrote:

Though, none of us have anything inappropriate in our signatures, or avatars. You're the one whose is in need of changing.

Quote :

Zayl Rathman: I wish to make love to you

How is this not inappropriate?

It's just as appropriate as your avatar, is, and your past ones.

And- another point I'd like to make, regarding my past signature, involving the two younger-females. They weren't necessarily 'lolis', they were 'chibi' there's a big difference.

I only see one line in Hyper's sig that's sexually suggestive at all. (the rest is just going "OH SHI-")

His avy isn't really suggestive unless you're a pedo. Or are turned on by any pic of a girl that isn't hidious.

Edit: And I don't deny that there's a quote in my sig that's suggestive. (pretty much just a sex joke)

And the first one -isn't- supposed to be! It's just a hunger joke >_>

Richard Crimson wrote:

I only see one line in Hyper's sig that's sexually suggestive at all. (the rest is just going "OH SHI-")

His avy isn't really suggestive unless you're a pedo. Or are turned on by any pic of a girl that isn't hidious.

It's a high school girl in the form of a chibi.

But regardless, I'm going to lock this before it escalates further into an argument. The issue at hand is that people don't follow the rule. Okay, point made.

There we go.

Chibi is a much nicer term than loli.

How about we just use that?

Kruggly wrote:

There we go.

Chibi is a much nicer term than loli.

How about we just use that?

Because chibis are just miniatures.

Lolis are mainly prepubescent girls.

Locked.