QUOTE BOMB!

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Pat wrote:

The first ammendment doesn't really apply because it's the same idea as a movie theater; You may be able to speak your opinion, but we reserve the right to kick you out if you bother other customers, or in this case, players

But you can't kick everyone out, because everyone is guilty, or atleast mostly everyone is guilty of it.

Movie theaters don't have to kick almost everyone out, because they properly enforced the rule in the first place.

And those who are who suppose to enforce these rules partaken in breaking them as well.

Yet enforcers in movie theaters don't.

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Pat wrote:

The first ammendment doesn't really apply because it's the same idea as a movie theater; You may be able to speak your opinion, but we reserve the right to kick you out if you bother other customers, or in this case, players

But you can't kick everyone out, because everyone is guilty, or atleast mostly everyone is guilty of it.

Movie theaters don't have to kick almost everyone out, because they properly enforced the rule in the first place.

And those who are who suppose to enforce these rules partaken in breaking them as well.

Yet enforcers in movie theaters don't.

And yet we aren't in the movie theaters.

Why can't the admins here be as enforcing as they are on FP? Cause seriously, if you guys were, there
would be almost -complete- order all the time. (aside from a few spare jokes and messing around every
while)

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Pat wrote:

The first ammendment doesn't really apply because it's the same idea as a movie theater; You may be able to speak your opinion, but we reserve the right to kick you out if you bother other customers, or in this case, players

But you can't kick everyone out, because everyone is guilty, or atleast mostly everyone is guilty of it.

Movie theaters don't have to kick almost everyone out, because they properly enforced the rule in the first place.

And those who are who suppose to enforce these rules partaken in breaking them as well.

Yet enforcers in movie theaters don't.

And yet we aren't in the movie theaters.

Although if was like we were in one, we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Pat wrote:

The first ammendment doesn't really apply because it's the same idea as a movie theater; You may be able to speak your opinion, but we reserve the right to kick you out if you bother other customers, or in this case, players

But you can't kick everyone out, because everyone is guilty, or atleast mostly everyone is guilty of it.

Movie theaters don't have to kick almost everyone out, because they properly enforced the rule in the first place.

And those who are who suppose to enforce these rules partaken in breaking them as well.

Yet enforcers in movie theaters don't.

And yet we aren't in the movie theaters.

Although if was like we were in one, we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

If we had the same adminstration as we did in a movie theater, we would have this problem.

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Pat wrote:

The first ammendment doesn't really apply because it's the same idea as a movie theater; You may be able to speak your opinion, but we reserve the right to kick you out if you bother other customers, or in this case, players

But you can't kick everyone out, because everyone is guilty, or atleast mostly everyone is guilty of it.

Movie theaters don't have to kick almost everyone out, because they properly enforced the rule in the first place.

And those who are who suppose to enforce these rules partaken in breaking them as well.

Yet enforcers in movie theaters don't.

And yet we aren't in the movie theaters.

Although if was like we were in one, we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

If we had the same adminstration as we did in a movie theater, we would have this problem.

Yet we already have this problem. Having administration that properly enforces the rule can't make it worse then it is now.

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Pat wrote:

The first ammendment doesn't really apply because it's the same idea as a movie theater; You may be able to speak your opinion, but we reserve the right to kick you out if you bother other customers, or in this case, players

But you can't kick everyone out, because everyone is guilty, or atleast mostly everyone is guilty of it.

Movie theaters don't have to kick almost everyone out, because they properly enforced the rule in the first place.

And those who are who suppose to enforce these rules partaken in breaking them as well.

Yet enforcers in movie theaters don't.

And yet we aren't in the movie theaters.

Although if was like we were in one, we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

If we had the same adminstration as we did in a movie theater, we would have this problem.

Yet we already have this problem. Having administration that properly enforces the rule can't make it worse then it is now.

So you are saying we should have movie theater administration members instead of the current ones?

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Pat wrote:

The first ammendment doesn't really apply because it's the same idea as a movie theater; You may be able to speak your opinion, but we reserve the right to kick you out if you bother other customers, or in this case, players

But you can't kick everyone out, because everyone is guilty, or atleast mostly everyone is guilty of it.

Movie theaters don't have to kick almost everyone out, because they properly enforced the rule in the first place.

And those who are who suppose to enforce these rules partaken in breaking them as well.

Yet enforcers in movie theaters don't.

And yet we aren't in the movie theaters.

Although if was like we were in one, we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

If we had the same adminstration as we did in a movie theater, we would have this problem.

Yet we already have this problem. Having administration that properly enforces the rule can't make it worse then it is now.

So you are saying we should have movie theater administration members instead of the current ones?

If it means that they would properly enforce the rule, then yes.

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Pat wrote:

The first ammendment doesn't really apply because it's the same idea as a movie theater; You may be able to speak your opinion, but we reserve the right to kick you out if you bother other customers, or in this case, players

But you can't kick everyone out, because everyone is guilty, or atleast mostly everyone is guilty of it.

Movie theaters don't have to kick almost everyone out, because they properly enforced the rule in the first place.

And those who are who suppose to enforce these rules partaken in breaking them as well.

Yet enforcers in movie theaters don't.

And yet we aren't in the movie theaters.

Although if was like we were in one, we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

If we had the same adminstration as we did in a movie theater, we would have this problem.

Yet we already have this problem. Having administration that properly enforces the rule can't make it worse then it is now.

So you are saying we should have movie theater administration members instead of the current ones?

If it means that they would properly enforce the rule, then yes.

Sounds like a plan, but one more thing.

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Pat wrote:

The first ammendment doesn't really apply because it's the same idea as a movie theater; You may be able to speak your opinion, but we reserve the right to kick you out if you bother other customers, or in this case, players

But you can't kick everyone out, because everyone is guilty, or atleast mostly everyone is guilty of it.

Movie theaters don't have to kick almost everyone out, because they properly enforced the rule in the first place.

And those who are who suppose to enforce these rules partaken in breaking them as well.

Yet enforcers in movie theaters don't.

And yet we aren't in the movie theaters.

Although if was like we were in one, we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

If we had the same adminstration as we did in a movie theater, we would have this problem.

Yet we already have this problem. Having administration that properly enforces the rule can't make it worse then it is now.

So you are saying we should have movie theater administration members instead of the current ones?

If it means that they would properly enforce the rule, then yes.

Sounds like a plan, but one more thing.

I agree.

What the shit

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Pat wrote:

The first ammendment doesn't really apply because it's the same idea as a movie theater; You may be able to speak your opinion, but we reserve the right to kick you out if you bother other customers, or in this case, players

But you can't kick everyone out, because everyone is guilty, or atleast mostly everyone is guilty of it.

Movie theaters don't have to kick almost everyone out, because they properly enforced the rule in the first place.

And those who are who suppose to enforce these rules partaken in breaking them as well.

Yet enforcers in movie theaters don't.

And yet we aren't in the movie theaters.

Although if was like we were in one, we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

If we had the same adminstration as we did in a movie theater, we would have this problem.

Yet we already have this problem. Having administration that properly enforces the rule can't make it worse then it is now.

So you are saying we should have movie theater administration members instead of the current ones?

If it means that they would properly enforce the rule, then yes.

Sounds like a plan, but one more thing.

I agree.

Then its settled.

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Pat wrote:

The first ammendment doesn't really apply because it's the same idea as a movie theater; You may be able to speak your opinion, but we reserve the right to kick you out if you bother other customers, or in this case, players

But you can't kick everyone out, because everyone is guilty, or atleast mostly everyone is guilty of it.

Movie theaters don't have to kick almost everyone out, because they properly enforced the rule in the first place.

And those who are who suppose to enforce these rules partaken in breaking them as well.

Yet enforcers in movie theaters don't.

And yet we aren't in the movie theaters.

Although if was like we were in one, we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

If we had the same adminstration as we did in a movie theater, we would have this problem.

Yet we already have this problem. Having administration that properly enforces the rule can't make it worse then it is now.

So you are saying we should have movie theater administration members instead of the current ones?

If it means that they would properly enforce the rule, then yes.

Sounds like a plan, but one more thing.

I agree.

Then its settled.

So it is.

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Pat wrote:

The first ammendment doesn't really apply because it's the same idea as a movie theater; You may be able to speak your opinion, but we reserve the right to kick you out if you bother other customers, or in this case, players

But you can't kick everyone out, because everyone is guilty, or atleast mostly everyone is guilty of it.

Movie theaters don't have to kick almost everyone out, because they properly enforced the rule in the first place.

And those who are who suppose to enforce these rules partaken in breaking them as well.

Yet enforcers in movie theaters don't.

And yet we aren't in the movie theaters.

Although if was like we were in one, we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

If we had the same adminstration as we did in a movie theater, we would have this problem.

Yet we already have this problem. Having administration that properly enforces the rule can't make it worse then it is now.

So you are saying we should have movie theater administration members instead of the current ones?

If it means that they would properly enforce the rule, then yes.

Sounds like a plan, but one more thing.

I agree.

Then its settled.

So it is.

I guess it is then!

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Pat wrote:

The first ammendment doesn't really apply because it's the same idea as a movie theater; You may be able to speak your opinion, but we reserve the right to kick you out if you bother other customers, or in this case, players

But you can't kick everyone out, because everyone is guilty, or atleast mostly everyone is guilty of it.

Movie theaters don't have to kick almost everyone out, because they properly enforced the rule in the first place.

And those who are who suppose to enforce these rules partaken in breaking them as well.

Yet enforcers in movie theaters don't.

And yet we aren't in the movie theaters.

Although if was like we were in one, we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

If we had the same adminstration as we did in a movie theater, we would have this problem.

Yet we already have this problem. Having administration that properly enforces the rule can't make it worse then it is now.

So you are saying we should have movie theater administration members instead of the current ones?

If it means that they would properly enforce the rule, then yes.

Sounds like a plan, but one more thing.

I agree.

Then its settled.

So it is.

I guess it is then!

Correct!

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Pat wrote:

The first ammendment doesn't really apply because it's the same idea as a movie theater; You may be able to speak your opinion, but we reserve the right to kick you out if you bother other customers, or in this case, players

But you can't kick everyone out, because everyone is guilty, or atleast mostly everyone is guilty of it.

Movie theaters don't have to kick almost everyone out, because they properly enforced the rule in the first place.

And those who are who suppose to enforce these rules partaken in breaking them as well.

Yet enforcers in movie theaters don't.

And yet we aren't in the movie theaters.

Although if was like we were in one, we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

If we had the same adminstration as we did in a movie theater, we would have this problem.

Yet we already have this problem. Having administration that properly enforces the rule can't make it worse then it is now.

So you are saying we should have movie theater administration members instead of the current ones?

If it means that they would properly enforce the rule, then yes.

Sounds like a plan, but one more thing.

I agree.

Then its settled.

So it is.

I guess it is then!

Correct!

Very true!

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Psyche wrote:

Donixs wrote:

Pat wrote:

The first ammendment doesn't really apply because it's the same idea as a movie theater; You may be able to speak your opinion, but we reserve the right to kick you out if you bother other customers, or in this case, players

But you can't kick everyone out, because everyone is guilty, or atleast mostly everyone is guilty of it.

Movie theaters don't have to kick almost everyone out, because they properly enforced the rule in the first place.

And those who are who suppose to enforce these rules partaken in breaking them as well.

Yet enforcers in movie theaters don't.

And yet we aren't in the movie theaters.

Although if was like we were in one, we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

If we had the same adminstration as we did in a movie theater, we would have this problem.

Yet we already have this problem. Having administration that properly enforces the rule can't make it worse then it is now.

So you are saying we should have movie theater administration members instead of the current ones?

If it means that they would properly enforce the rule, then yes.

Sounds like a plan, but one more thing.

I agree.

Then its settled.

So it is.

I guess it is then!

Correct!

Very true!

You're winner