Request for the un-ban of Mack.

Please un-ban Mack as he feels that he is now able to be a good member of Aeria. From personal experience myself he used to troll me, but his trolling "level" is now pretty low.
Please un-ban him so he can contribute to RP.

Ermm from my opinion and my beliefs I prefer not to unban him.

I agree,

Mack should be unbanned, and I've voiced my opinion already.
But as a community, we're 90% against him for stupid reasons. He was a good admin, and a good member. He just went about voicing his opinions the wrong way.

*sigh*... Everytime we let mack back in, We see him flame/troll people. I admit, he can be a pretty good guy at times, but I am generally unsure of this for now.

TRUlyjuST wrote:

*sigh*... Everytime we let mack back in, We see him flame/troll people. I admit, he can be a pretty good guy at times, but I am generally unsure of this for now.

He's changed.

It was a tough period for all of us, and Mack's actions which he now regrets, were out of a need for reform. He's seen this reform, or at least heard of it through much SF - and I believe we can let the legend that is Mackan Norberg back into our community.

*** Kruggly snaps a quick salute, tucks his documents under his arm and exits the office in a prompt turn.

Mack has gone from making you feel like a basement dweller, to touching your inner child.

I vote him in.

Psyche wrote:

Mack has gone from making you feel like a basement dweller, to touching your inner child.

I vote him in.

Ki- I agree.

Mack gets back in over my dead body.

Doublepost:

It's been decided by the entire administration team, BAs and heads, that Mack will remain banned.

What Ruta says goes. [/agreeingasskissing]

I'm just the messanger, this is the choice of the entire admin team.

Rutabega wrote:

I'm just the messanger, this is the choice of the entire admin team.

What (s)he said.[/inserious]

I thought -anyone- could be the messenger?

Rutabega wrote:

I'm just the messanger, this is the choice of the entire admin team.

I never decided this.

People change.

majority vote?

Yeah, had a meeting with all admins that were on, Krug wasn't at the time but we figured his viewpoint was the same as his post.

Right now we could use the members, and I enjoyed RPing with Mack.

Proper and up to par RP does not exempt one from behavioral punishments.

Unfortunately, that's true.

And it's a shame, but I suppose the opinion of one Krug can't sway your vote. Nevertheless, I stand with my original decision.

He's broken our trust five times counted. He's broken our rules five times counted.
He's also broken personal trusts and personal promises to certain people, and turned around and flamed them. He said he didn't mean to do this, or do that, but then he comes back and does it again.

It never ends. And that's really not all.

GeoWulf wrote:

It never ends. And that's really not all.

It never -ended-. But what if he did truly change, what if it ended now.

Throw your personal bias aside, take a deep breath and ignore your ego, just forget all the personal damage he's done - and give him a final chance. There are some good ideas floating around on how to do this.

Part of human nature to fail and try again

Gambit wrote:

Part of human nature to fail and try again

You seriously need to explain the point you're making in your posts.

Everything you type is like you leave it for us to decode it our own ways D:

(I'm an idiot for making my text smaller to get MORE attention)

Can't we have a majority vote of the whole community?

I speak in riddles for men to figure out.